Files
MathApp/CLAUDE.md
Zareian 66364e0e92 fix the campaigns concurrency test by fixing what it was catching
ExecuteCampaignRealConcurrencyTests had been written off as a known flake
for weeks — about 45% red on a full-suite run. It was not timing noise.
It was reporting a real defect, and the defect is in production code.

execute_campaign looped with .iterator(), which keeps the read cursor on
the user table open for the whole loop — a loop that writes a
CampaignDelivery per user and, on the sms branch, makes a network call to
Kavenegar in between. On SQLite that open cursor locks the table against
any concurrent writer, and the lock is not released until the loop ends.
So _retry_on_sqlite_lock could never recover from it no matter how long
it waited: widening its window from 0.5s to 2s (also done here, since the
linear backoff was too tight regardless) moved the failure rate not at
all on its own.

Both branches now materialise the ids before the first write. After the
change: 20 consecutive runs of the test itself and 3 full-suite runs, all
green.

This is not only a test fix. While we are on SQLite the same pattern
produces the same lock in production, where it surfaces as "database is
locked" on unrelated requests that happen to land during a campaign run.

Also in this pass
-----------------
- CLAUDE.md carried three sections each claiming to be the current state,
  with three different question counts (1,441 / 1,783 / reality 2,463).
  There is now one current-state section and the older two are labelled
  as history, so whoever picks this up next is not reading stale numbers
  as fact. Three other figures that had drifted are corrected against the
  database: the verdict split, the figure-gap share (881/~42% is now
  508/~14% after the five books were re-read), and the node coverage.
- Dropped four genuinely unused imports. The remaining pyflakes hits are
  the signal registrations in apps.py, which are imported for effect.
- .env.example suggested gpt-4o for vision; gpt-4.1-mini measured both
  cheaper and more accurate and is what the server actually runs.

Audited all 2,463 questions across every grade: no question with the
wrong number of options, none with zero or two correct answers, no empty
or duplicated option, no orphan lesson or node, no duplicate question
inside a lesson.

458 tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-22 04:43:44 +03:30

35 KiB
Raw Blame History

CLAUDE.md

This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.

Project

Django + DRF backend for Tadrisino, an educational app (Persian/Farsi). Codebase and API responses are in Persian; comments in source are Persian too.

Commands

source venv/bin/activate
python manage.py runserver
python manage.py migrate
python manage.py test                 # all tests
python manage.py test accounts        # single app
python manage.py test accounts.tests.SomeTestCase.test_something  # single test

Local dev requires DJANGO_DEBUG=1 (enables Swagger auth via DEV_MASTER_OTP/devOtp in responses). DEBUG defaults to False. Production also requires DJANGO_SECRET_KEY, DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS (comma-separated), and CACHE_URL (Redis — required whenever DEBUG=False since rate limiting needs a shared cache; raises ImproperlyConfigured otherwise).

No pytest; uses Django's built-in test runner. No linter/formatter configured.

Docker (docker compose up --build) adds a local Loki+Grafana Alloy+Grafana log stack; not a production setup (still runserver, not gunicorn). See comments in docker-compose.yml, docker/alloy/config.alloy, and LOG_DIR in config/settings.py.

API docs: Swagger /api/docs/, Redoc /api/redoc/, admin /admin/.

Architecture

Apps (each owns its own models, one responsibility):

app responsibility key models
accounts identity, sessions, OTP auth User, Profile, Session, OTPCode
content lessons/curriculum Grade, Unit, Node, Lesson, Question, Choice, NodeProgress
progress stats, leaderboard, streaks, gamification characters UserStats, LeaderboardEntry, StreakRecord, UserHearts, Character
ai_tutor AI assistant chat Conversation, Message, MessageFeedback
subscription plans Plan, Subscription
payment orders/transactions (Zarinpal gateway + Cafe Bazaar IAP) Order, Transaction
discount discount codes/offers DiscountCode, Redemption, Offer, UserOffer
notifications notifications Notification
affiliate referral program AffiliateAccount, Conversion
support tickets/bug reports BugReport, Ticket, TicketMessage
family parental control FamilyLink, ParentalSettings, WeeklyReportLog
statuslog generic cross-app status-change log StatusChangeLog
campaigns messaging campaign storage only, no send logic yet MessageCampaign
config project settings, root urls, middleware —

Auth is custom, not Django's. accounts.User is deliberately not AUTH_USER_MODEL — it's an independent business model. Auth is a stateless signed bearer token (django.core.signing, no JWT library) issued/verified in accounts/authentication.py (TadrisinoTokenAuthentication, header Authorization: Bearer <token>), backed by accounts.Session. Missing/invalid header → anonymous request, not a hard failure; each view's permission class decides if auth is required.

Apps are decoupled by convention: instead of real FKs across app boundaries, code uses loose refs (user_id, object_id + label) so any app can be split out later. Don't add cross-app FKs — follow the existing loose-reference pattern.

Throttling: DRF ScopedRateThrottle with per-endpoint throttle_scope strings, rates centralized in REST_FRAMEWORK['DEFAULT_THROTTLE_RATES'] in config/settings.py. Guest users are throttled by IP (NUM_PROXIES setting controls how many XFF hops are trusted — must match real proxy count in prod or IP spoofing/throttle-bypass is possible). Adding a new sensitive endpoint means adding both a throttle_scope on the view and a matching rate entry in settings.

POST /api/ai/ask currently returns a stub; real model integration point is generate_tutor_answer in ai_tutor/views.py.

Structured logging: config.middleware.APIRequestLoggingMiddleware (last in MIDDLEWARE, closest to the view) logs every /api/ request as JSON (method/path/status/duration/user, no body/headers/secrets) via config/log_formatters.py.

SQLite is current DB (OPTIONS.timeout=20 to tolerate concurrent-write locks, e.g. campaigns tests); README notes Postgres migration is still pending.

SMS goes through Kavenegar (KAVENEGAR_API_KEY/KAVENEGAR_SENDER); failures return explicit 503, not a fake success.

Gamification characters (progress.Character, Duolingo-mascot-style): an admin-managed catalog (like subscription.Plan — created via Django admin or seed_test_data, not by users). Unlocking is currently just UserStats.xp >= Character.unlock_xp (no separate ownership table); UserStats.selected_character_id is the user's active pick, set via POST /api/characters/select after that check. First real content beyond the model/plumbing (art assets, more characters, purchase-with-coins, etc.) is expected to land incrementally later.

Payment (Zarinpal): create_order/CreateOrderView never call Zarinpal directly — paymentUrl points at our own GET /api/payment/orders/{id}/pay (PaymentRedirectView), which calls Zarinpal's PaymentRequest API on first visit (storing Order.gateway_authority) and redirects to StartPay; this keeps order creation from depending on Zarinpal's uptime. Zarinpal redirects the user back to GET /api/payment/zarinpal/callback (ZarinpalCallbackView), which always re-verifies server-to-server via payment/zarinpal.py::verify_payment before marking an order paid — a forged Status=OK in the query string alone does nothing. Both payment/zarinpal.py and payment/bazaar.py fail closed (503 / invalid) when their credentials aren't configured, never a fake success.

Where this is heading (the owner's intent)

The owner writes this backend; another developer writes the frontend; a third person administers the server. None of them share a machine, and until recently the two halves were built in parallel without a shared contract — which is why reconciling them cost rework. The goal is not to merge the repos. Two repos, one API contract is the intended shape, and the contract lives in this repo's OpenAPI schema (/api/docs/), not in anyone's head.

What the owner is steering toward, in rough order:

  1. Both halves running against each other, on real content, with nobody hand-editing files on the server. Most of the plumbing for this now exists.
  2. Nothing manual in a release. Adding a dependency, a setting or a service must not add a step someone has to remember. When a change would, fold it into deploy.sh or make startup fail loudly and legibly instead.
  3. Content editable without a developer — questions, curriculum, plan copy, all from the admin panel. A management command run over SSH is a last resort, not a workflow.
  4. Answer quality measurable, not assumed: per-question reports, wrong-answer rates, prompt-version feedback. The senior's stated priority is proving the AI actually teaches, especially where students get stuck.
  5. Scale without drama — thousands of concurrent users should be a non-event. Prefer the boring fix (an index, a cache, a cheap guard) over new infrastructure.

The owner is early in their career and learning the collaboration workflow as they go. Explain the why alongside the what, flag when something is a product decision rather than a coding one, and never assume a step was done just because it was described.

Frontend ↔ backend (read before wiring the two together)

The app is two repos and two domains: the React frontend lives in Tadrisino/MathApp_frontend (deployed at math.tadrisino2.ir, owned by another developer) and this backend serves api.math.tadrisino2.ir. Our typed client for them is src/api/ inside their repo, delivered by pull request — we have read-only Gitea access there, so changes go via a fork + PR, never a direct push.

The one trap that keeps biting. Their App.tsx calls relative paths (fetch('/api/auth/login')). Those resolve against the frontend origin, where nginx answers any unknown path with index.html — so the response is 200 with an HTML body and the code dies on res.json() with Unexpected token '<'. Verify with curl https://math.tadrisino2.ir/api/grades: HTTP 200, HTML. Two fixes exist, both shipped in PR #3: a vite dev proxy (dev works unchanged) and an exported apiUrl() for builds. The better long-term fix is infrastructure, not code — proxy /api on the frontend domain to this backend, which makes everything same-origin and removes CORS entirely. That needs the server admin, not us.

Order matters when bringing the stack up: backend first, then frontend. If the frontend is tested while api.math.tadrisino2.ir is down, every screen fails and it looks like the client is broken.

Never hand-write the client from memory. Three of fifteen calls were silently wrong the first time. Dump the real contract with python manage.py spectacular --file schema.yaml --format openapi, then drive the actual client module against a running server (runserver on a spare port + npx tsx) before sending anything. content/tests_frontend_contract.py is the backend-side guard.

Content the frontend expects but nobody has filled in yet: Unit.blurb, Plan.features/badge, Lesson.example/steps. All optional, all editable from the admin panel. Node.icon/color fall back to a deterministic palette so cards are never colourless.

Operations

The whole release, as one line:

ssh -t administrator@78.38.35.249 'cd ~/mathapp-v2 && ./deploy.sh; sudo systemctl restart zareian-mathapp'

It asks for the password twice — once for ssh, once for sudo. Wait for each prompt; pasting several lines at once feeds the queued text to the password prompt and locks you out for three tries.

The trailing restart is separate because sudo inside deploy.sh cannot prompt for a password. The script no longer pretends that worked: it compares the service's start time before and after and exits non-zero when the restart did not happen, so a half-finished deploy can never again look like a successful one. Giving administrator a NOPASSWD sudoers line for just systemctl restart zareian-mathapp would collapse this to a single command; that is the server admin's call, not ours.

./deploy.sh is the whole release: fetch, reset to origin/<branch>, install, migrate, seed content, collectstatic, restart, then it polls /api/health and prints the likely cause if the service does not come back.

It repairs the server rather than stopping at it. A hand-edited file used to make git pull --ff-only fail, which aborted the whole script — and because every later step was skipped, the server silently stayed on old code. Now local modifications (and local commits) are saved to a timestamped patch under .deploy-backups/ and then discarded with git reset --hard origin/<branch>, and the deploy continues. Whatever state the server is left in, one run puts it back on exactly what Gitea has.

git clean is never run there and must never be added. db.sqlite3, .env and .django_secret_key are untracked and live in that directory; reset --hard leaves them alone, clean -fd would destroy the database, the config and every signed-in session.

Settings boot with working defaults (hosts, CSRF, CORS, secret key, cache), so a stale or partial .env on the server no longer breaks startup — env values are merged with those defaults, not replaced by them.

GET /api/health is the outside view: database, unapplied migrations, cache, content counts, security warnings, and recent traffic. It is how you check whether anyone has actually connected without asking a human.

Content: where it lives and how it gets to a server

content/seed/ holds the whole curriculum and question bank as committed JSON — curriculum.json (8 grades, 58 units, 263 nodes, 2,617 lessons) and questions.json (2,463 multiple-choice questions). deploy.sh runs seed_content on every release, so a fresh server fills itself with one command: no Qdrant, no AI credit, no SSH session.

seed_content is idempotent and never deletes. Questions bind to lessons by title path (grade › unit › node › lesson), never by primary key — ids differ between any two databases, and binding by id silently attaches questions to the wrong lesson.

seed_content --export writes the files back from the local DB. It refuses to overwrite a non-empty questions.json from a DB that has no questions (that used to wipe the file silently); use --export --only curriculum when you only mean the curriculum.

Answer quality: the verification layer

Books are read by a vision model from page images, so extraction errors enter there — a misread digit, a dropped decimal separator, a solution attached to the neighbouring problem. These are invisible in retrieval and only surface when something trusts the text.

rag_verify_solutions re-solves every extracted problem independently and compares. LessonChunk.solution_verdict is three-state — agrees / disagrees / unjudgeable — and the verdict also rides in the Qdrant payload under a key retrieval._payload_text does not read, so the tutor's context is unchanged. Current state (2026-09-22, across all 3,517 chunks): 2,466 agree, 354 disagree, 508 unjudgeable, 189 not yet checked — those 189 are the other team's علوم/مطالعات collections, never run through the checker. Question generation only ever reads agrees chunks.

Two things that were learned the expensive way and are already encoded in the prompts:

  • A boolean verdict is wrong. With two states every "I can't tell" becomes "wrong", which reported ~3× the real rate. Read samples before trusting any bulk run.
  • ۳/۱۰۴ in these books is the decimal 3.104, not the fraction 3÷104.

solution itself is never rewritten — the extracted text stays as the record, and the independent answer is stored separately in checked_answer.

The figure gap (largest open data issue)

508 chunks (~14%) reference a figure or table that is not in the text, so they cannot be answered or turned into questions. The vision model saw the figure; it was simply never asked to write it down. rag/services/pdf.py now carries a self-contained rule telling it to inline measurements and labels into the problem text, and re-reading the five math books under that rule is what brought this down from 881 (42%). What is left is concentrated in the three books that predate the rule (سوم/ششم/هفتم, the other team's); recovering them means re-ingesting those pages ($2.7 of API credit).

Quiz assembly

The app plays at node level (the island on the map) but questions hang off lessons, and a lesson here is the finest grain — one problem type from the book, not a class session. GET /api/nodes/{id}/quiz assembles a quiz from a node's lessons, at most one question per lesson. Shuffle is seeded on nodeId:userId, so a refresh returns the same quiz; questionCount is reported separately from requested so a thin node cannot look like an error. 224 of 263 nodes hold a full four-question quiz, and every node in grades 8–12 does; the 39 that fall short are all in grades 3/6/7.

AI provider notes

OPENAI_BASE_URL points at GapGPT (an OpenAI proxy reachable from Iran) and it exposes ~127 models, including reasoning ones. Two failures look alike and must not be treated alike — is_account_limit() in rag_verify_solutions is the shared guard:

  • 429 initial_usage_limit_exceeded — account cap, hours long. Retrying extends it.
  • 403 insufficient user quota — credit exhausted. Note the spaces: an earlier guard matched insufficient_quota with an underscore, missed it, and burned 770 doomed calls.

/dashboard/billing/usage returns cents and is the only reliable balance signal; the hard_limit_usd in /dashboard/billing/subscription is a placeholder, not a balance.

The key is currently out of credit. Bulk work since then runs on Claude Code subagents instead. Sonnet handles question authoring well (~88% yield); Haiku does not — it cannot reliably pull the final answer out of a solution and produced ~40% broken output.

Known gaps (per README pre-deploy checklist)

  • Still on SQLite, not Postgres.
  • Throttle rates need periodic review against real traffic.
  • DEV_MASTER_OTP (0000) must stay gated behind DEBUG — never enabled in prod.
  • No video content exists yet, though Lesson.kind/video_url can express it.
  • Grades 8–12 are fully covered: every node holds a four-question quiz. 39 of the 145 nodes in grades 3/6/7 (the other team's books) still hold fewer than four; none is empty, so every node still plays.
  • Kavenegar is unconfigured, so POST /api/auth/otp/request returns 503. With DEBUG=0 there is no way to log into the API without creating an OTPCode row in the admin (/admin/accounts/otpcode/add/) — this is how to hand a tester a working login.

The server: read this before running anything on it

api.math.tadrisino2.ir runs on a shared company machine (administrator@78.38.35.249, hostname haghzad), not a box that belongs to this project. Our app is one tenant among many. Also on it, all in production use by other people:

  • Gitea itself (gitea.service) — the company's git server, including this repo's origin. Breaking it means nobody can push or pull anything, anywhere.
  • Mail (postfix, dovecot), DNS (named), mariadb, postgresql@14, rabbitmq, metabase, redis-server, nginx.
  • Other apps: apirag, artinafront, metaverse, celerybeat, and a generic gunicorn.service that is not ours.
  • Other people's home directories: aria, artina, behdad, zahra, git, gitea. They are mode 0750 — unreadable as administrator, trivially readable under sudo. Do not read them. Nothing in this project needs them.

Our account is administrator, and sudo -l reports (ALL : ALL) ALL. It is also in the docker and lxd groups, each of which is root by another route. There is no technical guard rail between a careless command and the whole company's data. The only guard rail is the operator.

Ours is exactly one directory: /home/administrator/mathapp-v2, served by gunicorn-mathapp.service (unix socket, proxied by nginx). Note ~/mathapp also exists, is not a git repo, and is not what runs — do not touch it.

The same unit also answers to zareian-mathapp (a symlink alias in /etc/systemd/system/, added 2026-09-18). Prefer that name in anything a human will type or copy: gunicorn alone is a different team's service on this box, and tadrisino is too generic for a machine where other people's projects may claim it later.

sudo systemctl restart zareian-mathapp     # ours, unambiguous
sudo systemctl restart gunicorn            # NOT ours — someone else's app

Rules that follow from this, and are not negotiable:

  1. Never run a destructive command outside ~/mathapp-v2. No rm -rf, no git clean, no chown -R, no dropping databases, anywhere else. When a command takes a path, write the path out in full rather than relying on the current directory.
  2. Restart only gunicorn-mathapp. systemctl restart gunicorn is a different team's app. deploy.sh no longer guesses that name, and neither should you.
  3. Never delete the project directory or "re-clone fresh". db.sqlite3, .env and .django_secret_key live inside it and are all gitignored. A fresh clone silently destroys the database, the config and every logged-in session. Use git reset --hard origin/main when the tree needs to go back to a known state.
  4. Never git clean there for the same reason.
  5. Read .env only through Django. python -c printing settings.CACHES[...] and booleans is fine; cat .env is not, and neither is pasting its values into a chat.
  6. Take a timestamped backup before editing anything under /etc, and say where you put it.
  7. Disk is the standing risk. It has been sitting at ~95% full (about 6 GB free on a 113 GB volume). Check df -h / before anything that writes a lot — a full disk on this machine takes the mail server and Gitea down with us, not just our app.

Handling the server password (every agent, every time)

Access is a password for the shared administrator account, not a key. Handle it exactly like this — the steps exist for reasons, not ceremony:

printf '%s' '<password>' > "$SCRATCH/.pw"   # scratchpad, never the repo
chmod 600 "$SCRATCH/.pw"
sshpass -f "$SCRATCH/.pw" ssh administrator@78.38.35.249 '<command>'
ssh administrator@78.38.35.249 'sudo -S -p "" <command>' < "$SCRATCH/.pw"
shred -u "$SCRATCH/.pw"                      # immediately after, not "later"
  • Never put the password in the command line. ps on this box shows every process's full argv to every logged-in user, and several other teams have accounts here.
  • Never write it into the repo, a memory file, a commit, or a note. The scratchpad only, and only for as long as the commands take.
  • shred -u as soon as the work is done, not at the end of the session. Recreate it if more work comes; that costs nothing.
  • Never echo it back into the conversation, even partially, and never paste .env values either.
  • Do not create SSH keys, edit sshd_config, or change the password unless the user asks for that specifically. It is a shared account; changing it locks the admin out.

The password reaches an agent only because the user supplies it in that session. If it is not in the conversation, it is not available — say so and ask, rather than hunting for it on disk. If the user wants to stop pasting it into chat, the macOS Keychain is the local fix (security add-generic-password -s tadrisino-server -a administrator -w, then read it back with security find-generic-password -s tadrisino-server -w), and an SSH key is the real one.

DEBUG must never be 1 on this server: it turns on DEV_MASTER_OTP (0000), which accepts any phone number as a valid login, and renders tracebacks with settings in them. DJANGO_DEBUG belongs in .env only — not in the systemd unit, where it once sat as Environment="DJANGO_DEBUG=1" and was saved only by .env happening to override it.

DJANGO_SECRET_KEY is what signs our bearer tokens. It must be a real random value that exists nowhere in git. If the env var is simply absent and DEBUG=0, config/settings.py generates a strong one and stores it in .django_secret_key (mode 0600) — that is the preferred setup, because there is then no key to leak. Never let the server run on the django-insecure-… fallback from config/settings.py: that string is committed here, so anyone who can read this repo can forge a token for any user.

وضعیت فعلی (۲۰۲۶-۰۹-۲۲) — این را اول بخوان

سرور روی api.math.tadrisino2.ir زنده است و کدِ فعلی را سرو می‌کند (سرویس واقعاً ری‌استارت شد، نه فقط فایل‌ها روی دیسک). /api/health می‌دهد: grades: 8, lessons: 2617, questions: 2463 و هیچ مهاجرتِ اعمال‌نشده‌ای ندارد.

  • هر نودِ پایه‌های هشتم تا دوازدهم آزمونِ کاملِ چهارسوالی دارد. پایه‌های سوم/ششم/هفتم کتابِ تیمِ دیگرند: ۳۹ نود از ۱۴۵ کمتر از چهار سوال دارند، ولی هیچ‌کدام خالی نیست، پس روی نقشه جزیره‌ی مرده وجود ندارد.
  • ۴۵۸ تست سبز، check و check --deploy و makemigrations --check تمیز، و spectacular بدونِ خطا و هشدار (قرارداد کامل است).
  • تستِ هم‌زمانیِ campaigns که مدت‌ها flaky بود دیگر flaky نیست — علتش یک باگِ واقعی بود، نه طبیعتِ تست؛ پایینِ همین فایل توضیح داده شده.

بخش‌های تاریخیِ زیر به‌ترتیبِ زمان نگه داشته شده‌اند چون درس‌هایشان هنوز معتبر است؛ اعدادِ محتوایی‌شان کهنه‌اند و ملاک همین بخش است.


تستِ flakyِ campaigns یک باگِ واقعی بود (۲۰۲۶-۰۹-۲۲)

ExecuteCampaignRealConcurrencyTests ماه‌ها به‌عنوانِ «flakyِ شناخته‌شده» کنار گذاشته شده بود (~۴۵٪ قرمز روی اجرای کاملِ سوئیت). علتش تصادفی‌بودنِ زمان‌بندی نبود:

execute_campaign با .iterator() روی کاربرها حلقه می‌زد، یعنی کرسرِ خواندن در تمامِ طولِ حلقه باز می‌ماند — حلقه‌ای که وسطش CampaignDelivery می‌نویسد و در شاخه‌ی sms یک فراخوانیِ شبکه‌ای به کاوه‌نگار هم می‌کند. روی SQLite همین کرسرِ باز جدول را برای هر نویسنده‌ی هم‌زمان قفل می‌کند، و قفل تا پایانِ حلقه رها نمی‌شود — پس _retry_on_sqlite_lock هیچ‌وقت نمی‌توانست نجاتش دهد، هر چقدر هم صبر می‌کرد.

حالا هر دو شاخه پیش از اولین نوشتن، نتیجه را با list(...values_list(...)) مادی می‌کنند. بعد از این تغییر: ۲۰ اجرای پیاپیِ خودِ تست و ۳ اجرای کاملِ سوئیت، همه سبز.

⚠️ درسِ کلی: در این کدبیس .iterator() را دورِ حلقه‌ای که می‌نویسد یا I/O بیرونی می‌زند نگذارید. تا وقتی روی SQLite هستیم، این الگو در پروداکشن هم همان قفل را می‌سازد — آنجا به‌شکلِ «database is locked» برای درخواست‌های بی‌ربطِ دیگر.

تاریخچه — وضعیت ۲۰۲۶-۰۹-۱۷ (اعداد کهنه)

The server is live and running current code. main is at the latest commit, the service gunicorn-mathapp was restarted against it, and /api/health reports grades: 6, lessons: 1928, questions: 1441. /api/nodes/1/quiz returns a real four-question quiz. 435 tests green.

What that took, and the lessons worth keeping:

  1. The server ran two-day-old code while every file on disk was current. The pull and seed_content had happened; the service had simply never been restarted, so gunicorn still served the code it loaded on Sep 15. WhiteNoise builds its static-file index at startup too, which is why collectstatic had run and the admin panel still had no CSS. A file on disk is not a deployed file. Check systemctl show <service> -p ActiveEnterTimestamp before believing anything.
  2. deploy.sh reported success while this was true. It health-checked a public URL that the old process answered with 200. It now compares the service start time before and after, and exits non-zero when the restart did not happen.
  3. Two files had been hand-edited on the server (config/urls.py, deploy.sh), both only to add a trailing slash to the health route. That is why git pull kept conflicting. api/health/ is now registered upstream alongside api/health, so the edits were reverted and are not needed again.

Still open, and deliberately not acted on:

  • DJANGO_SECRET_KEY on the server is the django-insecure-… fallback committed in config/settings.py. Auth tokens are signed with it, so anyone who can read this repo can forge one. Fixing it means removing the key from .env and from the systemd unit and letting settings generate one. The owner decided this is the server admin's call, not ours. manage.py check --deploy flags it as security.W009 on every release.
  • CACHE_URL is unset, so rate limiting is per-worker (LocMemCache). Redis is already running on the box at 127.0.0.1:6379; db0 belongs to another app, db1 is free.
  • The frontend is still not wired to any API. src/api/ was merged (PR #1) but is imported nowhere; QuestionScreen in App.tsx still renders four hardcoded multiplication questions, and PR #3 (zareian/api-client-2) is still open upstream. Until someone connects the screens, none of the 1,441 questions are visible to a user.

The frontend's Question type carries a type field that nothing reads, and count_objects in Question.TYPE_CHOICES is an empty shell — no rows, no serializer branch, no rendering anywhere. Do not build content for it without asking first.

تاریخچه — وضعیت ۱۴۰۵/۰۶/۲۹ (۲۰۲۶-۰۹-۲۰) (اعداد کهنه)

سرور روی 3026df0 است، کد و محتوا هر دو منتشر شدند، سرویس واقعاً ری‌استارت شد، و /api/health عدد questions: 1783 می‌دهد. /api/nodes/1/quiz چهار سوالِ واقعی برمی‌گرداند.

۵ کتاب روی Qdrant، همه با دیتابیس همگام: ریاضی هشتم (۵۱۸)، نهم (۴۵۰)، دهم (۴۵۸)، حسابان یازدهم (۳۷۶)، حسابان دوازدهم (۳۲۶). صفحه‌ی گم‌شده: صفر. سه کتابِ تیمِ دیگر (سوم/ششم/هفتم، مجموعاً ۱٬۲۵۲) عمداً دست‌نخورده ماندند.

خرجِ کلِ آن روز ۳٫۴۴ دلار بود. روشِ ارزان و دقیقِ استخراج در docs/extraction-playbook.md نوشته شده — قبل از هر ingest تازه آن را بخوان، مخصوصاً بخشِ انتخابِ مدل.

حسابان یازدهم و دوازدهم: وارد مسیرِ بازی شد (۲۰۲۶-۰۹-۲۱)

کاربر تصمیمِ محصولی را گرفت و هر دو پایه ساخته شدند. seed_curriculum_from_textbook اسکلت را رایگان ساخت — یازدهم ۵ فصل/۲۱ نود/۳۶۹ درس، دوازدهم ۵ فصل/۱۲ نود/۳۲۰ درس — و سوال‌ها با subagentهای Sonnet نوشته شدند: ۵۵۹ سوال (یازدهم ۳۲۲، دوازدهم ۲۳۷). هر ۳۳ نودِ هر دو پایه آزمونِ کاملِ چهارسوالی دارند.

GRADE_STYLE حالا برای یازدهم/دوازدهم رنگ دارد (فیروزه‌ای و نیلی، عمداً جدا از شش پایه‌ی عمومی چون حسابان فقط کتابِ رشته‌ی ریاضی‌فیزیک است).

روالِ ساختِ سوال با subagent، حالا ابزار دارد

generate_questions_from_chunks --export DIR جفت‌های (درس، مسئله‌ی تأییدشده) را در فایل‌های JSON می‌ریزد و هیچ فراخوانیِ پولی نمی‌کند؛ کنارشان یک *-RULES.txt با عینِ همان PROMPTی که به مدلِ پولی می‌رفت می‌نویسد، تا کیفیتِ دو شاخه از هم جدا نیفتد. خروجیِ subagent با content.question_io وارد می‌شود (فایلِ بد هیچ‌چیز نمی‌نویسد).

بازده روی ۷۷۸ ورودی: ۶۸۰ سوال، ۸۷٪ — بقیه عمداً رد شدند، بیشترشان مسئله‌هایی که بدونِ شکلِ کتاب خودکفا نمی‌شوند. چند subagent خطایِ حسابِ خودِ کتاب را هم گرفتند (راه‌حلی که √ را ۶ نوشته بود ولی ۶٫۵ بود؛ راه‌حلی که می‌گفت حد وجود ندارد درحالی‌که داشت) — یعنی solution_verdict='agrees' تضمینِ کامل نیست، فقط فیلترِ اول است.

باگی که همان‌جا پیدا و اصلاح شد: اجرای دوم با --per-lesson بالاتر همان chunkِ قبلی را دوباره تحویل می‌داد و سوالِ تقریباً تکراری می‌ساخت. حالا _targets به اندازه‌ی سوال‌هایی که درس از قبل دارد از ترتیبِ قطعیِ chunkها می‌پرد. این خطا نه لاگ می‌داد، نه در import گیر می‌افتاد (چون صورتِ سوال بازنویسی می‌شود و رشته‌اش یکی نیست).

⚠️ سقفِ هفتگیِ Sonnet واقعی است و ناگهانی می‌رسد. ۲۰ subagentِ هم‌زمان (هرکدام ~۹۵ هزار توکن برای ۳۰ سوال) آن را در یک نشست پر کرد. اگر کارِ انبوه داری، دسته‌ها را کوچک‌تر بگیر و بینشان نتیجه را وارد کن — خوشبختانه بیشترِ agentها فایلشان را نوشته بودند و فقط در تماسِ آخر خوردند، پس چیزی از دست نرفت.

چیزهایی که آن روز کشف شد و تکرارشان گران است

  • مدل را اندازه بگیر، از جدولِ قیمت نخوان. قیمتِ GapGPT با قیمتِ رسمی یکی نیست: gpt-4.1-mini هم از gpt-4o ارزان‌تر بود هم دقیق‌تر، و gemini-3.6-flash برخلافِ انتظار سه برابرِ gpt-4o گران درآمد. OPENAI_VISION_MODEL=gpt-4.1-mini الان در .env است و هر پنج کتاب با همان خوانده شد.
  • ساختِ سوال را با subagent انجام بده، نه با API. generate_questions_from_chunks پیش‌فرضش o4-mini است و ~۰٫۷۷ سنت برای هر سوال می‌گیرد (چهار برابرِ تخمینِ خودش، چون مدلِ ریزنینگ است). همان کار با subagentهای Sonnet رایگان است و بازده‌اش ۹۲٪ بود. روالش: جفت‌های (درس، مسئله‌ی تأییدشده) را به JSON بده، subagent خروجی بنویسد، و با content.question_io واردش کن.
  • --recheck در rag_verify_solutions همه‌چیز را دوباره می‌فرستد، نه فقط موارد تازه. برای بازبینیِ یک زیرمجموعه، رأیشان را خالی کن و اجرای عادی بزن.
  • شمارنده‌ی صفحات حینِ --refresh معنی ندارد — هر صفحه اول پاک و بعد خوانده می‌شود، پس عدد دورِ کل نوسان می‌کند. پیشرفت را از IngestedPage.created_at بسنج.
  • در untilِ انتظار، ps | grep خودش را می‌شمارد و حلقه هرگز تمام نمی‌شود. از pgrep -f استفاده کن.
  • کد و محتوا دو مسیرِ جدا دارند. db.sqlite3 در gitignore است؛ سوال‌ها فقط از راهِ seed_content --export --only questions و کامیتِ content/seed/questions.json به سرور می‌رسند. پوش کردنِ کد به‌تنهایی محتوا را نمی‌برد.

CORS

پورت‌های توسعه دیگر شمرده نمی‌شوند؛ CORS_ALLOWED_ORIGIN_REGEXES هر پورتی روی localhost/127.0.0.1 را می‌پذیرد. اگر باز هم گزارشِ CORS رسید، اول بپرس Hard Refresh زده‌اند یا نه — مرورگر نتیجه‌ی preflight را کش می‌کند.