Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
5003b8a852 write down the frontend test account, which existed only in one person's notes
A shared guest account was hand-seeded into the production DB on 2026-09-22 so
the frontend developer could see the notification and leaderboard screens before
any real traffic exists: deviceId "frontend-test-device", user 6, with 24
Notification rows and 20 LeaderboardEntry rows across both periods, ordered
differently per period so the ?period= parameter is visibly doing something.

None of that was recorded in the repo. db.sqlite3 is gitignored, so the account
existed only in the head of whoever set it up — exactly the kind of thing that
disappears at a handoff. It is now in docs/frontend/README.md, where the
frontend developer looks, and in docs/operations.md, where whoever runs the
server looks.

Verified against production before writing it down: the account still resolves
to user 6 with isNewUser false, notifications return rows, and both leaderboard
periods return six entries. The notifications payload is keyed "items", not
"results", which is noted because it is easy to read as an empty response.

The operations entry carries the warning that matters: this is hand-written data
in a production database, purge_demo_data will not catch it (it only matches
[SEED]/[DEMO] prefixes on Grade/Plan/Character/User), and it has to go before
real users arrive or they will see invented notifications.

The Swagger description now says a deviceId can be any string and that
pre-seeded ones exist on request, but deliberately does not print the specific
value: /api/docs/ is reachable from the public internet, and a public API
reference should not advertise a shared account that anyone can sign into.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-23 01:55:16 +03:30
5492788bf8 make the README an entry point and move procedures into docs/
The README had grown into a 295-line mixture of onboarding, an ops runbook, a
content-authoring workflow, bulk question generation and a Docker log stack. A
reader arriving at the repo could not tell in ten seconds what this service is,
whether it is live, or where to start, and five of its claims no longer matched
the code:

- it said to export .env values by hand; settings.py has loaded .env through
  python-dotenv for a while now
- it listed six variables as "everything the app actually reads"; .env.example
  has carried many more than that for some time
- it called DJANGO_SECRET_KEY, DJANGO_ALLOWED_HOSTS and CACHE_URL required in
  production; all three now have working defaults, and the app boots without
  them on purpose so a partial .env cannot take the service down
- it claimed there is no insecure SECRET_KEY fallback; there is one, under DEBUG
- it required Python 3.12 while the project runs on 3.11 (Docker uses 3.12)

The README now states what the service is, where it runs, how healthy it is and
how to get it running in six commands, then links onward. Procedures moved to
docs/operations.md, docs/content-authoring.md, docs/architecture.md and
docs/docker.md, which is where someone follows a procedure rather than skims it.
Nothing was dropped; the deploy one-liner now includes the separate sudo restart
that deploy.sh cannot perform itself, and backup/restore is written down for the
first time.

Every number in the README was measured rather than quoted: content counts from
the live /api/health and content/seed/curriculum.json, 55 endpoints from the
generated OpenAPI schema, 481 tests from a full run.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-23 01:12:04 +03:30